首页bet356百科全国理事会投稿须知新闻动态期刊目录广告征订留言板联系我们编辑的话
您当前的位置:首页 >> 正文

2010—2012年泰州市主城区生活饮用水水质检测结果分析 [中文引用][英文引用]

Analysis on the Quality of Drinking Water in Main Urban Districts of Taizhou in 2010-2012

作者:黄久红1 丁震2
 
作者(英文):Huang Jiuhong1 Ding Zhen2 
单位: 
单位(英文): 
关键词:生活饮用水 合格率 
关键词(英文):drinking water  qualification rate 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2014·4·第5期(483-486)
DOI: 0
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

目的 了解泰州市生活饮用水卫生质量,预防控制介水传染病。方法 依据《泰州市城市生活饮用水监测方案》设置监测点、采样频率,依据《生活饮用水标准检验法》(GB 5750 - 2006)对水样进行检测。出厂水、管网末梢水、二次供水均依据《生活饮用水水质卫生标准》(GB 5749 - 2006)进行评价。结果 2010—2012年,市政供水出厂水、管网末梢水水质合格率分别为100.00%(24/24)、95.61%(566/592);乡镇水厂供水出厂水、管网末梢水水质合格率分别为90.91%(40/44)、81.82%(36/44);二次供水水质合格率为92.50%(111/120)。市政供水出厂水、管网末梢水水质合格率差异无统计学意义(P ﹥0.05)。乡镇水厂供水出厂水、管网末梢水水质合格率差异无统计学意义(P ﹥0.05)。市政供水出厂水、乡镇水厂供水出厂水水质合格率差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。市政供水管网末梢水、乡镇水厂供水管网末梢水水质合格率差异有统计学意义(P ﹤0.05)。市政供水管网末梢水、二次供水水质合格率差异无统计学意义(P ﹥0.05)。出厂水不合格指标为游离氯、氨氮;管网末梢水不合格指标为菌落总数、游离氯、氨氮、铁;二次供水不合格指标为菌落总数、游离氯、铁。结论 泰州市主城区生活饮用水水质整体合格率较高,部分指标仍不合格,应进一步加强生活饮用水的卫生监督、检测和规范。
 

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Objective To analyze the quality of drinking water in main urban districts of Taizhou and to prevent and control water-borne infectious diseases. Method  The collection of water samples was based on the scheme of drinking water surveillance in Taizhou downtown; samples were tested according to the Standard Examination Methods for Drinking Water (GB5750-2006),  and the test results were evaluated by the Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB5749-2006).  Results The qualification rates of the finished water from water plants and tap water in downtown were 100.00% (24/24) and 95.61% (566/592) in 2010~2012; on the contrary, those in townships were 90.91% (40/44) and 81.82% (36/44), respectively.  The qualification rate in secondary water supplies was 92.50% (111/120).  The qualification rates of finished water from water plants in downtown and township presented no statistical difference (P﹥0.05), but the qualification rates of tap water in downtown and townships showed statistical difference (P﹤0.05). Additionally, the qualification rates of tap water in downtown and from secondary water supplies showed no statistical difference (P﹥0.05).  The unqualified indexes for finished water were free chlorine and ammonia nitrogen, for tap water were the total counts of bacteria, free chlorine, ammonia nitrogen and iron, and for secondary water supplies were the total counts of bacteria, free chlorine and iron.  Conclusion  The quality of drinking water in downtown were high, but some indexes did not reach the corresponding criteria, further enforcement on supervision and administration is needed.
 

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

欢迎阅读《环境卫生学杂志》!您是该文第 1448 位读者!

若需在您的论文中引用此文,请按以下格式着录参考文献:
中文着录格式: 黄久红1,丁震2
.2010—2012年泰州市主城区生活饮用水水质检测结果分析.环境卫生学杂志.2014;4(5):483-486.
英文着录格式: Huang,Jiuhong1,Ding,Zhen2.Analysis on the Quality of Drinking Water in Main Urban Districts of Taizhou in 2010-2012..2014;4(5):483-486.

与该文相关的文章(仅限于本刊内

已投本刊未发表相似文章

《环境卫生学杂志》编辑部 © 2014
  ICP备案号:京ICP备11024750号     京公安备案:11010202007828号